What is Jekyll Island?

In November 1910, after having consulted with the Rothschild banks in England, France, and Germany, Senator Nelson Aldridge boarded a private train in Hoboken, New Jersey. His destination was Jekyll Island, Georgia, and a private hunting club owned by J.P. Morgan. Aboard the train were 6 other men: Benjamin Strong, president, Morgan's Bank & Trust Company; Charles Norton, president, Morgan's First National Bank of New York; Henry Davidson, senior partner, J.P. Morgan; Frank Vanderlip, president, Khun-Loeb National City Bank of New York; Abraham Piatt Andrew, and assistant secretary of the treasury; and noted financial advisor Paul Warburg.

The secret meeting was described by one of its architects, Frank Vanderlip, as follows:
There was an occasion near the close of 1910 when I was as secretive, indeed as furtive, as any conspirator. I do not feel there is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve system. We were told to leave our last names behind us. We were told further that we should avoid dining together on the night of our departure. We were instructed to come one at a time, where Senator Aldrich's private car would be in readiness attached to the rear end of the train for the south. Once aboard the private car, we began to observe the taboo that had been fixed on last names, a discovery we knew simply must not happen or else all our time and effort would be wasted.

The goal was to establish a private bank that would control the national currency. The challenge was to slip the scheme by the representatives of the American people. Earlier it had been called the Aldrich Bill and received effective opposition. The devious planners of the revised bill titled it the "Federal Reserve Act" to mask its real nature. It would create a system controlled by private individuals who would control the nation's issue of money. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve Board, composed of 12 districts and one director, the Federal Reserve chairman, would control the nation's financial resources by controlling the money supply, available credit and by mortgaging the government through borrowing.

This kind of conspiracy would be unnecessary today, but in those days, the average voter was sophisticated enough to understand the issues. Today, all that would be necessary.

The conspirators had a problem because President William Howard Taft had made it clear that he would veto such a bill if it was introduced. They had to make sure that he did not win re-election. At first, they supported former President Teddy Roosevelt in the Republican primaries, but he failed to get the nomination. Then the bankers supported the Democratic contender, Woodrow Wilson. In exchange for their support, WIlson promised to sign their bill into law, but the problem was the polls indicated that Wilson would only draw about 45% of the vote. The bankers needed someone to draw a sufficient number of Republican votes away from Taft without harming their Democratic candidate. So they arranged for Teddy Roosevelt to run against both of them by representing a newly invented third party called the Bull Moose Party.

The plan worked. The Federal Reserve Act was held to vote on until December 23, when everyone went home on leave except those who had been bribed to remain or who were somehow beholden to the power elite. Only those senators and congressmen who had not gone home, owed favors, or were on the payroll of bankers were present to vote on the legislation. It's interesting that involved behind the scenes in the election of Woodrow WIlson and Franklin Roosevelt was Col. Edward House, son of the Civil Was Rothschild agent, Thomas W. House. Col. Edward House was a representative of the interests of the Rothschild Bank. Originally he was a member of the Institute of International Affairs formed in Paris at the Majestic Hotel in a secret meeting on May 30, 1919. It's American branch was formed on July 29, 1921, and is now known as the Council of Foreign Relations.

The Federal Reserve Act was a way to pacify the American voters. They had been crying out for banking reform and held scores of elections, alternating one set of politicians for another, only to find themselves with the same programs and getting deeper in debt. A prominent congressman, Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., had complained that it was a common practice of congressmen to make the title of a piece of legislation sound like a promise or a right, but in the body or text to actually take away that which was promised in the title. Lindbergh also pointed out that the government officeholders understood that if they joined with the banking interests to exploit the American people, their re-election was more certain than if they served the people who elected them. By joining the exploiters, their campaign expenses were paid, the support of the political machines and the capitol press was assured, and - if by chance they should lose - they were appointed to an office or position that was equal to or better.

The same phenomenon is visible today. It seems that the same cast of characters emerges in key positions whether the nation goes Democratic or Republican. Both sides appear to have sold out. For example, the North American Trade Agreement and the GATT Agreement were both called "agreements" to avoid requiring the two-thirds majority of the Senate that the Constitution requires. Later they are called "Treaties". Why weren't they called "treaties" up front? Because they wouldn't have passed. They only passed with a bare majority in a special session of lame duck Congress that had just been swept out of office.

Even Woodrow WIlson felt that he had made a terrible mistake in signing the Federal Reserve Act. He later wrote:
"Some of the biggest men in the United States in the field of commerce and manufacture are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so prevasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."


Written by Chuck Missler, from the book, "Steeling the MInd of America" by various authors. Get your copy at Amazon.......

PLEASE! LETS AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE, better yet, lets just get rid of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve ADMITS that Its 12 Banks Are PRIVATE – Not Government – Entities

Washintong’s Blog
July 26, 2011

Much of the tens of trillions in bailout money and “easy” money from quantitative easing went to foreign banks.
Indeed, Ron Paul noted recently that one-third of all fed bailout loans – and essentially 100% of loans from the New York Fed – went to foreign banks.
The New York Fed is the most important Fed bank. As Bloomberg pointed out in 2009:
The New York Fed is one of 12 regional Federal Reserve banks and the one charged with monitoring capital markets. It is also managing $1.7 trillion [now up to at least $1.9 trillion] of emergency lending programs [and accepting collateral from the banks in return].
However, the country’s most powerful “agency” – the Federal Reserve – is actually no more federal than Federal Express. The Fed itself admitted (via Bloomberg):
While the Fed’s Washington-based Board of Governors is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act and other government rules, the New York Fed and other regional banks maintain they are separate institutions, owned by their member banks, and not subject to federal restrictions.
For that reason, the New York Fed alleged in the lawsuit brought by Bloomberg to force the Fed to reveal some information about its loans - Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan) – that it was not subject to Federal Freedom of Information Act. As Bloomberg reported in a separate article:
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York … runs most of the lending programs. Most documents relevant to [a freedom of information lawsuit filed by Bloomberg news] are at the New York Fed, which isn’t subject to FOIA law, according to the central bank. The Board of Governors has 231 pages of documents, to which it is denying access under an exemption for trade secrets.


As the long-time Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee (Charles McFadden) said on June 10, 1932:
Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies ….
Similarly, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – often called the “central banks’ central bank”, as it coordinates transactions between central banks, and which is the entity determining the level of reserves banks are required to keep worldwide – is itself owned by the central banks of the world.
As Spiegel reported in 2009:
The BIS is a closed organization owned by the 55 central banks. The heads of these central banks travel to the Basel headquarters once every two months, and the General Meeting, the BIS’s supreme executive body, takes place once a year.
In, other words, the private banks own the Fed (and mos other central banks), and the central banks – in turn – own BIS, the global bank regulator.
Interestingly, Spiegel points out that BIS is largely immune from regulation, oversight or taxes:
Formally registered as a stock corporation, it is recognized as an international organization and, therefore, is not subject to any jurisdiction other than international law.It does not need to pay tax, and its members and employees enjoy extensive immunity. No other institution regulates the BIS, despite the fact that it manages about 4 percent of the world’s total currency reserves, or €217 trillion ($304 trillion), as well as 120 tons of gold…
Central bankers are not elected by the people but are appointed by their governments. Nevertheless, they wield power that exceeds that of many political leaders. Their decisions affect entire economies, and a single word from their lips is capable of moving financial markets. They set interest rates, thereby determining the cost of borrowing and the speed of global financial currents.

How do you measure a nation's wealth?

I remember some time ago when I used to post on the Economist forum......the British magazine, and they had at that time proposed a house debate on whether or not the GDP was a accurate way to gauge a nation's wealth. Many left comments and some suggested that truly the only way to gauge a nation's wealth was by it's citizens on a per capita consumption.

The GDP is more of a general term but IS NOT accurate I believe because it is the consumer that really determines the wealth of a nation. It is the consumer on a per capita basis that determines how wealthy a nation is and right now American consumers are not buying on a per capita basis. They are broke. It is only the RICH and that is the top 1% that are buying. WOW.....porche sales are up....but I can tell you FOR SURE that the majority of American's can not afford a porche. More and more middle class Americans are joining the ranks of the poor. And when you watch the business channels and they report on profits or higher sales from companies, it truthfully is because the rich are the ones buying, not the average Jane Doe or Joe Smuck!

You can look at several other nations and see that even though they may have a high GDP, most of their citizens are impoverished.

It is only the top few percent that drive the economies of the world. Just like Haiti. How much money has been pledged and donated there for years and years, yet it's citizens are still impoverished, yet the government boasts of fancy, expensive cars and palatial abodes. Clearly the rich are EXPLOITING the people!

It is also similar to the CPI. I NEVER have believed that the CPI is an accurate way to gauge inflation. The Fed chairmen through the years have repeatedly "assured" us that inflation is within reason because the CPI has only gone up only a "half percent". Well that is what they want you to believe but it is NOT the truth. Just look at the prices of most basis goods and juxtapose them to their prices 10 years ago. The CPI is bullshit and so is a nation's GDP, especially if a nation's debt matches it's GDP. There is NO wealth behind that what so ever.

Our leaders are mafia extortionists to the max. They have deceived the American people so bad as they continue to siphon more and more money out of each one of us. The only way to gauge a nation's wealth is by the character of it's leaders and whether or not they are righteous, because if they are not, they will continue to exploit each one of us.

Great Idea to raise revenue.........tax our turds!

So I just got in the mail yesterday a tax bill for 144 dollars. Now keep in mind I already pay a local tax that comes out of my paycheck from my part-time job and yet they still sent me a bill expecting me to pony up cash that I simply do not have! Like I said before.........trying to beat a dead horse back to life.......preposterous!

I told the lady on the phone that I already pay local taxes and I do not own property, I rent. She tells me that this is a per capita tax intended for the school district and is entirely separate from the local tax taken out of my paycheck. I explained to her that I do not have any children either. She stills expected me to pay this nonsense!

I swear, we must pay these people money to sit around and scheme up ways to siphon money out of each one us. Can you imagine? Well I have a fantastic idea............

What about a per capita tax for each turd you put in the toilet? Suppose you crap 3 petite turds instead of one giant turd? Should you be taxed more? And what if you have diarrhea? That could potentially raise more revenue!

Simply put, this whole world system needs to be flushed down the toilet!

This is why I get so passionate about politics because what these policy makers do on a daily basis effects each one of us more and more and eventually they will demand that YOU foot the bill for the national debt while the greedy rich elite and rich bankers pocket more and more for themselves!



This is the IRS.....Count Dracula speaking! I will suck ALL the money out of YOU!